Quantisation of the free electromagnetic field implies quantisation of its angular momentum
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Deformation Quantisation of Gravity
We study the deformation (Moyal) quantisation of gravity in both the ADM and the Ashtekar approach. It is shown, that both can be treated, but lead to anomalies. The anomaly in the case of Ashtekar variables, however, is merely a central extension of the constraint algebra, which can be “lifted”. Finally we write down the equations defining physical states and comment on their physical content....
متن کاملApproximating vector quantisation by transformation and scalar quantisation
Vector quantization provides better ratedistortion performance over scalar quantization even for a random vector with independent dimensions. However, the design and implementation complexity of vector quantizers is much higher than that of scalar quantizers. To reduce the complexity while achieving performance close to optimal vector quantization and better than scalar quantization, we propose...
متن کاملElectromagnetic field angular momentum in condensed matter systems
Various electromagnetic systems can carry an angular momentum in their E and B fields. The electromagnetic field angular momentum (EMAM) of these systems can combine with the spin angular momentum to give composite fermions or composite bosons. In this paper we examine the possiblity that an EMAM could provide an explanation of the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE) which is complimentary to...
متن کاملQuantisation of Kadomtsev-petviashvili Equation
A quantisation of the KP equation on a cylinder is proposed that is equivalent to an infinite system of non-relativistic one-dimensional bosons carrying masses m = 1, 2, . . . The Hamiltonian is Galilei-invariant and includes the split Ψ m1 Ψ m2 Ψm1+m2 and merge Ψ m1+m2 Ψm1Ψm2 terms for all combinations of particles with masses m1, m2 and m1 + m2, with a special choice of coupling constants. Th...
متن کاملBatalin—Vilkovisky Quantisation
2 Path Integrals 3 2.1 Gaussian Integrals and Beyond... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 Gauge-fixing Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2.1 Gauge-fixing: Faddeev—Popov . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2.2 Gauge-fixing: BRST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Modern Optics
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0950-0340,1362-3044
DOI: 10.1080/09500340.2011.571797